<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Empoprise-BI - Latest Comments in How will we "write the book on it" in the future?</title><link>http://empoprise-bi.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://empoprise-bi.disqus.com/how_will_we_write_the_book_on_it_in_the_future/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:11:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How will we "write the book on it" in the future?</title><link>http://empoprise-bi.blogspot.com/2009/11/how-will-we-write-book-on-it-in-future.html#comment-22062376</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Especially since the sentence is arguing for virtual storage, the inadvertent reference to a concrete object is particularly amusing. Unless the writer was speaking in an atomic sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:11:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How will we "write the book on it" in the future?</title><link>http://empoprise-bi.blogspot.com/2009/11/how-will-we-write-book-on-it-in-future.html#comment-21701941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"...more particle...?"  plenty of words might have fit there, but maybe this is a demonstration of scanning risks...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joel garry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>